Audience Testimonials

L1 Batch 21 “Chawl 420″ Audience Testimonials

General comments

The whole play was very cool. Loved the whole energy of the play. Was my first play and chose da rite one. Hope I’ll get to see more performances from you guys. Thanks!!! Keep up the good work! CALL ME FOR UR NEXT PLAY – Pragati/Jitesh
Considering that this actually is their first performance, I would say the play and acting was good as seasoned professionals. I’d rate 9.5 out of 10. – Radhakrishnan
The concept was great. Each individual was responsible for the success of “Chawl 420″. The play was well put and well connected. – Kim
To hold a smile is not imaginary for me. The way the comedy was carried out holding smile is ‘Brilliant’ and ‘Excellent’. – BhagyaLakshmi
Play was good considering the fact that is is culmination of workshop. Performances were good. They all can go a long way in case they stay true to theatre. Play was interesting as a whole…as first timers…it was nice…GOOD JOB – Vineet and Radhika
This was the third play I have watched, and by far the most entertaining play. Along with entertaining the audience, there was a good interaction with them, which created and aroused more interest in them. – Shweta
A very good play. Enjoyed it a lot. Keep it up. – Preetham
Very well done. Well timed. I enjoyed it. – Jay
Overall it was good performance and linked to each other. – Birendra
The concept was nice. – Sneha
Concept was great. Keep up the good work. HURRAH MISFITIANS! – Monica
In total, it was good act. Liked the flow of it. – Suhana
Unique humorous story. AS it is first instance, it is excellent. – Mazumdar
Excellent play, good show! Well connected and most characters played their parts well – Asefa


Feedbacks on specific groups and actors

Group: Ravi and Dia

  • High energy levels.
  • Good voice modulation.
  • Different accents/languages well managed.
  • Very natural. Especially the modulation with various accents.
  • Was very good. Amazing chemistry.
  • They lived the characters and were very real.
  • Very good performance: Dia got the character out, and liked Ravi’s “tapori” style.
  • Good chemistry and good voice.
  • Ravi was foolproof.
  • Good.
  • The role played by Ravi and Dia was too good. Felt it was so real. I liked the comedy involved in the play.
  • Good energy. Good accents.
  • Dia was good. Fantastic. Ravi was also very good.
  • Both had good chemistry and showed comfort.

Group: Shweta and Samyuktha

  • Well performed.
  • Transition of roles amazing.
  • Good.
  • Strong, native performance.
  • Scene 3: Good chemistry between the two.
  • Shweta: The second and third performance was really nice. “U ROCK”.
  • Samyuktha: The 3rd performance was nice.
  • Good (again).
  • Samyuktha was very good.
  • Shweta was good.

Group: Prakruthi and Deepak

  • Great facial expressions.
  • Some of the dialogues were not it. Inspite of that, both carried it of well.
  • Very good Haryani and Bengali accent.
  • Very good facial expression from Prakruthi.
  • Prakruthi – nice acting and good accent.
  • Great acting skills.
  • Both presented a very good act. Prakruthi carried her role very well.
  • Most lively performance by them. Chemistry was the BEST.
  • Both were cute.
  • Deepak was excellent. He needs a special mention.
  • Excellent.
  • Liked the way Prakruthi spoke all her dialogues, i.e, accents used. I appreciate Prakruthi’s expression throughout the play. Costumes chosen were very accurate.
  • Deepak had good voice modulation with Bengali accent.
  • Prakruthi had an ease in handling the body movements.
  • Deepak was good with characterization. Prakruthi was also good. Good comedy.

Group: Sunny and Karan

  • Good chemistry.
  • Seemed very natural.
  • Good acting by both.
  • Natural acting.
  • GOOD ACT.
  • Good chemistry (again).
  • Karan was good. Sunny was real.
  • Very good.
  • The character “Sameer” was very well played by Karan.
  • Noticed Karan was too involved.
  • Good chemistry and style of both the characters.
  • Sameer was good.
  • Karan: Towards honest acting.
  • Karan has shown natural acting.

Group: Jugnu and Anuj

  • Very into the character.
  • Jugnu has great voice.
  • Good acting by Jugnu.
  • Very talented actors.
  • GOOD ACT.
  • Nice effort.
  • Anuj was perfect.
  • Jugnu was good.
  • Very good.
  • Their part of the story looked real. Jugnu had a very good body language.
  • Anuj gave a good performance of a true mad man.
  • Anuj and Jugnu were good.
  • Jugnu has done well, especially her accent.

Group: Sujata and Sameer

  • Great job.
  • Both played good characters very well.
  • Sujata’s accent was very,very natural.
  • Sameer’s body language/expressions were very good.
  • Smooth both of them.
  • Good actors.
  • Very well performed; dialogue delivery is a plus.
  • Sameer potrayed the henpecked husband very well.
  • Sujata was amazing througout; expression throughout was good.
  • Second most lively performance by them. Good chemisty. Sujata had a clarity.
  • Sujata, you are growing from strength to strength. Your act was amazing. Not to forget Sameer; he was also awesome. An actor par excellence.
  • Good.
  • Performed very well. A very good flow of speech.
  • I loved Sujata’s character and the way she enacted it.
  • Excellent script and the play was well performed. Brilliant henpecked husband. Good accent.
  • Sameer was very good.
  • Sujata was very confident. Very good characterization. Right at top.
  • Had very good chemistry.

Group: Ajit and Subhasis

  • Very well done.
  • Both had excellent chemistry.
  • Excellent.
  • A very good role as a pair.
  • Good everyone hooked. Great skills.
  • Played character throughout.
  • Great performance “Butt” good chemistry as well.
  • Subhasis as Dead Body: Speechless and Awesome!!!
  • Ajit: Cool.
  • Subhasis was excellent. He needs a special mention.
  • Excellent.
  • I loved the “Yamraj” character played by Ajit. Subhasis’ expressions were very good.
  • Subhasis and Ajit’s characters was successful in creating the balance throughout the play.
  • Excellent connect with the rest of the play.
  • The still position Ajit maintained was good. Subhasis’ affinity to dead body was good. The pun was good.
  • Ajit was good.
  • Subhasis had excellent expressions. Very good.
Previous post

Ian Castelino

Next post

“Phases” – Level 2 Batch 5 Interactive session

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *